Claims Research LabSynthetic claim inputs
UC04

Loss verification

Baseline first · candidate experiment

Existing catastrophe, weather and incident feeds come first. Ask for only a precise missing corroboration question or public source outside that coverage, not routine loss verification.

Interactive Responses evidence scope · Decisions unavailable · Monitor preview only

Main dependency

Actual vendor names, adapter contracts and coverage are unverified here; missing setup is not a claimed business gap.

  1. 01

    Weather & incidents

    Existing baseline · simulated here

  2. 02

    Coverage check

    Answered already? Stop; zero Parallel calls

  3. 03

    Precise extra question

    Optional, explicit action only

  4. 04

    Incremental evidence

    Supported additions, coverage and reviewer effort

fixture — Simulated baseline and optional external evidence. Every observation is fabricated; no provider calls are made.

Scenario input Synthetic

Outbound public context preview
{
  "peril": "hail",
  "loss_window_utc": {
    "start": "2024-05-26T22:00:00Z",
    "end": "2024-05-27T01:00:00Z"
  },
  "timezone": "America/Chicago",
  "location": {
    "zip": "75201",
    "state": "TX"
  },
  "radius_km": "10.00",
  "question": "What public event evidence overlaps this hypothetical loss?"
}

Kept local: precise coordinates (ZIP and state sent by default)

Incremental outside research Optional

Interactive Responses evidence scope · Decisions unavailable · Monitor preview only

A precise missing corroboration question or missing public source. Candidate experiment, not a verified deficiency. If existing evidence answers the question, stop.

No baseline evidence yet.
Run history

No runs yet.